Home  |    About LFA   |    Mailing List   |    Chapter Locator   |    LFA Store   |    Sitemap
  LFA Home : Education : Topics: Outcome of Incomplete Lupus
search:
  Education

Facts & Overview

Information and
Publications

Links & Resources

  Support
  LFA Research
  What's New?

Lupus Foundation
of America, Inc.
www.lupus.org
2000 L Street, N.W., Suite 710
Washington, DC 20036
Phone 202-349-1155
Fax 202-349-1156
Contact Us



Outcome of Incomplete Lupus Erythematosus

Luis M. Vila, M.D.

From Lupus News Winter 2002-03 Vol. 22, No. 4

Is it systemic lupus, or ...?
Common features of incomplete lupus
Can incomplete lupus develop into SLE?
ILE study results
Conclusions
About the Author

Is it systemic lupus, or…?


Many people are referred to rheumatologists to "rule out" systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). There are usually several diagnostic possibilities for such cases.

  • It may be definite or incomplete SLE.
  • It may be a connective tissue disease that has clinical overlap with SLE (i.e. Sjögren's syndrome).
  • It may be an unspecified connective tissue disease.
  • And, in some instances, there will not be any rheumatic disease at all.

Individuals with incomplete lupus erythematosus (ILE) are those who have some clinical features of SLE, but not all of the required diagnostic criteria based on the classification devised by the American College of Rheumatology. According to this classification, a person is said to have SLE if at least 4 of the 11 established criteria are met (see Table 1). Someone who meets only a few of these criteria might be considered to have ILE by their rheumatologist.

Common features of incomplete lupus

Common features of ILE are:
- tiredness
- low-grade fever
- joint pain
- hair loss
- the facial "butterfly rash"
- a positive test for antinuclear antibodies, or ANA.

This individual probably does have SLE, but shows only two ACR classification criteria: the butterfly rash and a positive ANA.

Only a few studies have been published on the clinical presentation and outcome of ILE cases, and the variation in selection criteria and methods used in these studies makes it difficult to reach conclusions.

Nevertheless, people with ILE appear to have a mild disease, frequently with arthritis, cutaneous involvement, and a positive ANA test. Organ-threatening disease such as kidney or brain involvement seems to be uncommon.

Can incomplete lupus develop into SLE?

The immediate question asked by people who are diagnosed with ILE is whether the disease will stay the same or will evolve into SLE.

Is there any way to predict who will develop SLE? A study that attempted to answer these questions was performed at the Universidad Central del Caribe School of Medicine, Bayamón, Puerto Rico. The results of this study were published in Lupus 2000: 9, 110-115.

Because of the great clinical overlap that exists between SLE and other connective tissue diseases, the selection criteria were chosen very carefully (see Table 2). Excluded individuals were those who fulfilled the classification criteria for other rheumatic diseases, or who presented distinctive clinical features of other connective tissue diseases-for example, individuals with fibromyalgia syndrome, which shares many symptoms with SLE.

ILE study results

In this study, 87 Puerto Ricans (82 women, 5 men) met the study criteria for ILE, with an average disease duration of 4.4 years. These individuals were followed for an average of 2.2 years. The participants whose diagnosis remained ILE throughout the study were then compared to two different groups: those in the study whose disease evolved into SLE, and members of a well-established group of 94 SLE patients.

Of the total of 87 study subjects who were initially diagnosed with ILE, only eight cases (9 percent, all female) evolved into SLE. The average age at onset was lower in those who developed SLE (24 years) than in those who remained with ILE (34 years).

The average time interval between onset of ILE and development of SLE was 4.4 years. None of the individuals whose disease evolved into SLE had neurologic, cardiac, or pulmonary involvement. Only one person developed kidney disease, but never developed renal insufficiency or severe renal damage.

At baseline, individuals who remained with ILE were less likely than those whose disease evolved into SLE to have:
- photosensitivity
- elevated anti double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels, or
- low C3 complement levels.

And when the initial symptoms of ILE were compared with all cases of SLE, those with ILE were less likely to have:
- photosensitivity
- butterfly rash
- oral ulcers
- Raynaud's phenomenon
- arthritis
- serologic abnormalities (such as low serum complements C3 and C4, elevated anti-dsDNA, positive anti-Sm, anti-RNP, anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies).

Statistical analysis showed that the most important factors to predict the evolution of ILE into SLE were:

  • butterfly rash
  • oral ulcers
  • elevated anti-dsDNA, and
  • low C4.

Conclusions

The findings of our study are in agreement with other studies in three ways.
1) First, persons with ILE seem to have mild disease in which life-threatening complications are rare.
2) Second, only a small number of those with ILE develop further SLE manifestations.
3) Finally, those who develop SLE still continue with a mild disease.

On the other hand, marked differences are found in the predictors of disease evolution among ILE studies. Other studies have identified discoid (skin) lupus, homogeneous pattern of ANA, and positive anti-Sm antibodies as risk factors for SLE occurrence. In addition to different selection criteria, these variations could be attributed to ethnic or racial influence. It is known that clinical manifestations, immunologic features, and outcome of SLE may vary substantially among people from different ethnic origins.

Further studies are needed to determine the outcome of ILE and to identify the risk factors of disease progression. This information will help to provide better medical care to people with ILE, and to identify those who may develop disease progression.

To achieve these goals it will be necessary to:
1) establish more definitive and uniform criteria,
2) follow patients for longer periods of time, and
3) study patients of different ethnic backgrounds.

About the Author

Dr. Luis M. Vilá is Chief and Program Director, Division of Rheumatology, at the University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine in San Juan, PR. He was previously an Assistant Professor, Division of Rheumatology, at Universidad Central del Caribe School of Medicine in Bayamón, PR. Dr. Vilá is one of the Investigators for the LUMINA Study: "Lupus in minority populations: Nature vs Nurture."

Table 1. The 11 Criteria Used for the Diagnosis of Lupus Erythematosus

   Criterion
Definition
Malar Rash   Rash over the cheeks
Discoid Rash   Red raised patches
Photosensitivity   Reaction to sunlight, resulting in the development of or increase in skin rash
Oral Ulcers   Ulcers in the nose or mouth, usually painless
Arthritis   Nonerosive arthritis involving two or more peripheral joints (arthritis in which the bones around the joints do not become destroyed)
Serositis   Pleuritis or pericarditis (inflammation of the lining of the lung or heart)
Renal Disorder   Excessive protein in the urine (greater than 0.5 gm/day or 3+ on test sticks) and/or cellular casts (abnormal elements the urine, derived from red and/or white cells and/or kidney tubule cells)
Neurologic  
Disorder  
Seizures (convulsions) and/or psychosis in the absence of drugs or metabolic disturbances which are known to cause such effects
Hematologic  
Disorder  
Hemolytic anemia or leukopenia (white blood count below 4,000 cells per cubic millimeter) or lymphopenia (less than 1,500 lymphocytes per cubic millimeter) or thrombocytopenia (less than 100,000 platelets per cubic millimeter). The leukopenia and lymphopenia must be detected on two or more occasions. The thrombocytopenia must be detected in the absence of drugs known to induce it.
Antinuclear  
Antibody  
Positive test for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in the absence of drugs known to induce it.  
Immunologic  
Disorder  
Positive anti-double stranded anti-DNA test, positive anti-Sm test, positive antiphospholipid antibody such as anticardiolipin, or false positive syphilis test (VDRL).

Adapted from: Tan, E.M., et. al. The 1982 Revised Criteria for the Classification of SLE. Arthritis & Rheumatism 25:1271-1277.

> back to the top

Table 2: Selection Criteria For Incomplete Lupus Erythematosus

Inclusion criteria:

1. Clinically-apparent lupus, having at least one but less than four of the ACR criteria for the classification of SLE.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Drug-induced lupus
  2. Fulfilling classification criteria for the diagnosis of the following rheumatic diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, polymyositis, dermatomyositis, Sjögren's syndrome, vasculitides (temporal arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, polyarteritis nodosa, Wegener's granulomatosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, hypersensitivity vasculitis) Behçet's disease, antiphospholipid syndrome, seronegative spondyloarthropathies (ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, Reiter's syndrome) or fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).
  3. Presence of any of the following connective tissue disease features: erosive arthritis, scleroderma clinical signs (skin tightening, calcinosis, telangiectasia), polymyositis features (proximal muscle weakness, elevation of muscle enzymes), dermatomyositis rashes (heliotrope rash, Gottron's rash), sicca symptoms (dry eyes, dry mouth), sacroiliitis, sausage digits, or FMS tender points.

> back to the top

July 30, 2003

 
  © 2001 Lupus Foundation of America, Inc.